+of+DTN+LOGOS+CHART+YELLOW+RED+0.6)
Source: DTN News - - This article compiled by Roger Smith from reliable sources including Telegraph.co.uk - By James Kirkup, Political Correspondent(NSI News Source Info) TORONTO, Canada - August 27, 2010: Britain could be forced to "borrow" American warplanes for its new aircraft carriers as
the Armed Forces' core capabilities are eroded by budget cuts.
the Armed Forces' core capabilities are eroded by budget cuts.The country could also turn to America for surveillance aircraft if plans to buy new RAF spy planes are scrapped.
Furthermore, the Navy may lose its ability to put troops ashore in an amphibious assault.
Furthermore, the Navy may lose its ability to put troops ashore in an amphibious assault.
The prospect of relying on allies for military hardware has emerged from talks about the extent of the defence cuts.
Dr Liam Fox, the Defence Secretary, has said that, instead of "salami-slicing", where pain is shared equally across the department, the cuts must be allocated strategically.
Defence sources have suggested this will result in the Forces giving up entire capabilities, like aerial surveillance and amphibious landing.
Britain would have to rely on allies until the defence budget recovered, when these operations could be resumed.
The cuts could also have serious implications for the Navy's two new aircraft carriers, which will cost £5 billion and are due to enter service in 2014 and 2016.
Dr Liam Fox, the Defence Secretary, has said that, instead of "salami-slicing", where pain is shared equally across the department, the cuts must be allocated strategically.
Defence sources have suggested this will result in the Forces giving up entire capabilities, like aerial surveillance and amphibious landing.
Britain would have to rely on allies until the defence budget recovered, when these operations could be resumed.
The cuts could also have serious implications for the Navy's two new aircraft carriers, which will cost £5 billion and are due to enter service in 2014 and 2016.
Defence sources said at least one of the carriers was almost certain to be completed, but questions hang over the second.
If the second carrier is built, it could be adapted to carry helicopters instead of jets. A more radical option would see the second carrier shared with another country, most likely France.
The Treasury is understood to be budgeting for the cost of the carriers as empty hulls, and balking at the additional cost of planes to fly from them. A military source said: "The Treasury seems to think it's quite normal to budget for aircraft carriers with no aircraft to carry. It's rather bizarre."
To ensure both carriers are built, Navy chiefs are considering making several sacrifices. These include retiring Britain's 45 Harrier jump jets ahead of schedule.
The Harriers, operated by both the Navy's Fleet Air Arm and the RAF, are due to retire in 2018 and be replaced with new Joint Strike Fighters. But the jets could be retired earlier, saving more than £1 billion. That in turn could mean that the first carrier enters service in 2014 with no British aircraft to carry.
This would lead to the possibility of using borrowed US Marine Corps aircraft.
To help fund the carriers, Navy chiefs are also likely to give up the service's amphibious task force of landing ships and commandos.
"It comes down to a choice between carrier strike capability and amphibious landing, and they're not going to give up the carriers," said one Whitehall source.
That would attract controversy because the amphibious task force was the heart of the operation that liberated the Falkland Islands in 1982.
As The Daily Telegraph disclosed earlier this month, the Navy could also sacrifice operational control of the Royal Marines to the Army.
If the second carrier is built, it could be adapted to carry helicopters instead of jets. A more radical option would see the second carrier shared with another country, most likely France.
The Treasury is understood to be budgeting for the cost of the carriers as empty hulls, and balking at the additional cost of planes to fly from them. A military source said: "The Treasury seems to think it's quite normal to budget for aircraft carriers with no aircraft to carry. It's rather bizarre."
To ensure both carriers are built, Navy chiefs are considering making several sacrifices. These include retiring Britain's 45 Harrier jump jets ahead of schedule.
The Harriers, operated by both the Navy's Fleet Air Arm and the RAF, are due to retire in 2018 and be replaced with new Joint Strike Fighters. But the jets could be retired earlier, saving more than £1 billion. That in turn could mean that the first carrier enters service in 2014 with no British aircraft to carry.
This would lead to the possibility of using borrowed US Marine Corps aircraft.
To help fund the carriers, Navy chiefs are also likely to give up the service's amphibious task force of landing ships and commandos.
"It comes down to a choice between carrier strike capability and amphibious landing, and they're not going to give up the carriers," said one Whitehall source.
That would attract controversy because the amphibious task force was the heart of the operation that liberated the Falkland Islands in 1982.
As The Daily Telegraph disclosed earlier this month, the Navy could also sacrifice operational control of the Royal Marines to the Army.
**Link to this article "Royal Navy May Need To Borrow US fighter Jets - Telegraph.co.uk - By James Kirkup, Political Correspondent "
**This article is being posted from Toronto, Canada By DTN News ~ Defense-Technology News, contact: dtnnews@ymail
Related Articles
*Royal Navy underfunding has left it 'inadequate' for vital tasks, report finds
*Proposed cuts to the Navy will weaken our ability to shape EU defence policy
*Battle Royal' as Forces chiefs clash over cuts
*Reducing our Armed Forces will leave Britain dangerously reliant on our allies
*Big guns don't win today's wars
*Royal Navy aircraft carriers '£1 billion over budget'
*Royal Navy underfunding has left it 'inadequate' for vital tasks, report finds
*Proposed cuts to the Navy will weaken our ability to shape EU defence policy
*Battle Royal' as Forces chiefs clash over cuts
*Reducing our Armed Forces will leave Britain dangerously reliant on our allies
*Big guns don't win today's wars
*Royal Navy aircraft carriers '£1 billion over budget'
No comments:
Post a Comment